Defining Real Project Success
Defining Real Project Success
By Lynda Bourne
There are at least three different criteria for success that can operate independently:
- Project Management Success
- Technical Success
- Business Success
Project Management success includes the ‘iron triangle’ of time, cost and quality (measured by meeting the specification) plus ‘stakeholder satisfaction’ including sponsors, steering committees, the project team, clients and others.
Technical success includes elements of stakeholder satisfaction (primarily associated with satisfied customers) and extends into the areas of integration, requirements met, and system use. Essentially this is a ‘capability focus’; technical success means the project deliverable could work in the way it was intended and was useable.
Business success focuses on the delivery of the intended benefits, including meeting business objectives and the continued operation of the business through the implementation or change over. Business success is value focused and is only measurable some time after the project has been completed.
Interestingly, studies demonstrate that creating a clear definition of ‘success’ during the early phases of a project contributes to achieving a successful outcome. The act of defining success and measuring success in a consistent way becomes a ‘self fulfilling prophecy’ provided it is supported by an improvement driven culture (ie not a blame driven culture).
Understanding what is really important in achieving a successful outcome helps the project team work with its clients and sponsors in an open and effective way that maximises ‘success’ for the organisation. This is a value focused approach that allows informed decisions to be made based on what really matters rather than basing all decisions on the simplistic criteria of time and cost.
However, achieving the type of culture needed to allow a broad definition of success requires the involvement of Boards and top level management in the process. Everyone needs to recognise the limitations of ‘project management success’ and shift the focus to ‘project success’ (ie the realisation of benefits to create value for the organisation). This is a business focus and only the business can actually realise the benefits by using the project deliverables effectively. Without effective ‘Top Management Support’ (TMS) the overall achievement of real success is unlikely because the key decisions needed to optimise value in the business are unlikely to be made without TMS involvement.
Dr. Lynda Bourne DPM, PMP.
Lynda is the Managing Director of Stakeholder Management Pty Ltd. This business is focused on improving the capability of organisations to effectively manage their stakeholder relationships to the benefit of both the stakeholders and the organisation’s projects. She is also the Director of Training with Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd, where she is responsible for the development and delivery of OPM3, PMP, CAPM, Stakeholder Management and other project management training.
Lynda is a recognised international author, seminar leader and speaker. She is a SeminarsWorld® presenter and an accredited OPM3 ProductSuite Assessor and Consultant who has led a number of commercial OPM3 ProductSuite assessments.
She graduated from RMIT University Melbourne as the first professional Doctor of Project Management in 2005. Her research on defining and managing stakeholder relationships has lead to the development of the Stakeholder Circle® tool set and the SRMM® maturity model. Lynda blogs regularly on the Mosaic Projects blog.



Interesting that you would separate the definition of success into 3 parts and that the project management success is measured separately from the business and technology success. Are you suggesting that a project manager can be successful in an effort that fails to dliever business value?
I agree that focusing on project delivery is appropriate – what role in a project is accountable for successful delivery, isn’t it the project manager?
Hi Kate,
I think that’s exactly Lynda’s point: Project Success is totally different than Project Management Success. The success of a project is usually determined by its viability in the market, while Project Management success, is being on time, on schedule, and on scope. There are many cases where the project was successful from a Project Management point’s of view, but a complete failure from a business point of view (the Iridium project), or vice versa (such as the Sydney Opera House).
It is the Project Manager’s responsibility to make sure that the project is delivered, but I’m not sure it’s his/her responsibility to make sure that the project is commercially successful.
We have seen couple of Projects where we have acheived the Project Management success but the project failed in business. This is basically due to fact that when the project was started there was not a deep analysis about the market and the requirements(scope) of the project.
As mentioned by the author it’s really very necessary to have “The act of defining success and measuring success in a consistent way and it’s part of improvement driven culture”. There are many examples where this process becomes a blame game and it leads to Project failure.
I personally feel that by adapting this approach all are working in Integrated mode and everyone is working for project success but not the individual success.
What are your recommandation if we are in blame game situation and the stakeholders are working for their success but the Project is leading to failure or How we can get the Top Management Support and basically explain them the imporance of consistenet measurement of project success.
Ashish it would be difficult to offer you completely targeted advice regarding your two questions, but my thoughts on transforming a blame game culture into a unified, performing and continually improving culture.
A “blame game” culture lacks leadership and unification. As suggested in the article, Top Management Support (I would go a step further and say Enlightened Top Management Support) must be capable of, and successful in bringing disparate groups and their competing priorities together.
Bridge building, team building, inspired communication and decision making skills are critical leadership qualities during such an endeavor.
Practical skills in outlining success dimensions, surfacing obstacles and problems hindering achievement, and the ability to develop a unified and agreed upon action plan are also necessary when it comes to “getting it done”. Find this support and skillset within your organization and you’ve got a solid start.
Good luck.